chriskalani
11-09 01:09 AM
I don't think anyone ever even gets jobs from posting here....
wallpaper Virtual hairstyles for style
chanduv23
11-01 07:35 PM
Those who came to the NJ meet - please post your experiences here.
Blog Feeds
04-08 08:40 AM
In a post last summer ("The Immigration Singularity"), I accused the Department of State (DOS) of hoodwinking the Office of Management and Budget by getting OMB to approve use of a new, all-purpose nonimmigrant visa application form, the DS-160, without submitting the form itself for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act: In my view, State snookered OMB in approving the release of the DS-160 under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) without providing the public with access to a complete copy of the form and all the questions posed. The purpose of the PRA is to reduce the burden of completing...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/immigration-quantum-leaping-and-lying-the-ds160-visa-application.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/immigration-quantum-leaping-and-lying-the-ds160-visa-application.html)
2011 latest long hair styles for
e3visa
01-10 07:50 PM
If you have a pending permanent residency application you should still be able to work under h1b status, particularly if your i-140 is approved.
more...
pappu
10-19 10:00 AM
I am looking for a good immigration lawyer based out of chicago. I had some questions and thought I will call and talk to a lawyer. If anybody knows of any lawyer who is not expensive and is good, please let me know
Thanks is advance
Sandeej
You can join our Free attorney conference calls held on Thursdays. You can ask your question for free to Attorneys during the call. Check the thread on this call on the forum.
Thanks is advance
Sandeej
You can join our Free attorney conference calls held on Thursdays. You can ask your question for free to Attorneys during the call. Check the thread on this call on the forum.
miguy
07-19 08:06 AM
If I file my I-485 through my lawyer, will I have to be with him for all subsequent EAD/AP renewals as well or can I renew them on my own?
Do lawyers charge extra for EAD/AP renwals?
Do lawyers charge extra for EAD/AP renwals?
more...
mikec
05-15 08:33 PM
hello, i really need some one to clarify this information for me.
when i first started working with my company i did not have work authorization and basically said i am a US citizen, i never had any problems for 4 years, i am a permanent residence now and got my green card this year. the company now nows that i lied 4 years ago when i got hired and i was not allowed to work but am fully eligible to work now becaue of change in status to PR. can the company resubmit a new i9 form with the correct information and if i will be in any trouble with USCIS.
What is the law for someone who worked illegaly but got his or her status changed to PR.
THANK YOU
when i first started working with my company i did not have work authorization and basically said i am a US citizen, i never had any problems for 4 years, i am a permanent residence now and got my green card this year. the company now nows that i lied 4 years ago when i got hired and i was not allowed to work but am fully eligible to work now becaue of change in status to PR. can the company resubmit a new i9 form with the correct information and if i will be in any trouble with USCIS.
What is the law for someone who worked illegaly but got his or her status changed to PR.
THANK YOU
2010 Dreadlock hairstyles boys emo
jsb
05-08 02:09 PM
visa bulletin is already out
EB2 India - 01JAN00
Good news for EB2-I people with 1999 and earlier PD's. They have been waiting far too long. Good luck for them. They have now done 10 years in the US, and will qualify for SS, anyway.
EB2 India - 01JAN00
Good news for EB2-I people with 1999 and earlier PD's. They have been waiting far too long. Good luck for them. They have now done 10 years in the US, and will qualify for SS, anyway.
more...
Macaca
11-10 05:44 PM
Why Moderate Republicans Wield Newfound Clout; Democrats Need Allies To Override Bush Vetoes Of Major Legislation (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119457364946187455.html) By David Rogers. Wall Street Journal, Nov 9, 2007
Long ignored when their party was in control, moderate Republicans are the new power brokers in an increasingly bitter series of veto confrontations between President Bush and the Democratic Congress.
Senior Democrats met last night with centrist House Republicans, trying to get a veto-proof majority for a child-health-insurance initiative opposed by Mr. Bush. Senate moderates played a part in an earlier 79-14 roll call overriding his veto of a water-resources bill. Moderates in both chambers will decide the future of a $151 billion education, labor and health-care budget approved by the House last night, 274-141, with 51 Republicans opposing the president.
The new dynamic reflects both the Democratic takeover of Congress and how Mr. Bush responded to it. In 1994, after Republicans took over, President Clinton saw a new middle ground defined by the election and moved away from fellow liberals in Congress. Mr. Bush did the opposite, moving to the right to shore up his conservative base, leaving an opening in the center.
The White House's more-confrontational tactics are a strategy calculated to disrupt the new majority and reduce the effectiveness of Congress to challenge Mr. Bush on the war in Iraq. The result has been a convergence of veto threats over spending levels and domestic policy, leaving little time for the two sides to reach deals.
A stopgap bill to keep the government funded until Dec. 14 neared passage last night, and Democrats have agreed to give the president his top priority: a $471 billion Pentagon budget including emergency funds for armored vehicles in Iraq. But new fights flared up in the House over war policy, and there is no peace in sight on the domestic front.
The education budget faces an almost certain veto. A $105.6 billion transportation and housing budget, approved by House-Senate negotiators, faces the same fate.
The White House argues that Democrats won no mandate in 2006 to increase spending and have floundered over how best to present the bills to Mr. Bush. "Their strategy changes by the hour," White House Budget Director Jim Nussle said. "I get different answers from every one of them."
Unaccustomed to the spotlight, Republican moderates find themselves in an uncomfortable role somewhere between being tied to the railroad tracks as the Democrats and White House come barreling down, and being the switchman who can save the train.
Yesterday's Senate vote on the water-resources veto was the first time Mr. Bush has been overridden. The more-telling test will come on the child-health-insurance and education bills now in play.
The health-care bill calls for an additional $35 billion in spending over the next five years to expand coverage for the children of working-class families. To win over moderates, Democrats are prepared to add tighter income limits and push more parents off the rolls. There has been a backlash from New Jersey and Rhode Island senators worried about the impact on their states; at the same time, House Republican leaders are pressing to pull their members back.
"There's a decent chance of a deal," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.).
"I'm seeing the potential for some successes," said Rep. Joseph Knollenberg (R., Mich.).
As talks continue, a synergy has developed between the fate of the child-health bill and education budget, known as the "Labor H" bill -- so much so that the health talks even moved into the House Appropriations Committee rooms last night as members voted on the floor.
On a vote Tuesday night, it was evident that Republicans, who had stood with the president against the health-care bill, were looking for a chance to show their independence on the second bill, Labor H.
"There was a lot of talk in the corner. 'I'm getting a lot of heat at home because of my [health-care] vote,'" said Rep. Steven LaTourette (R., Ohio). "'I have to make it right on Labor H.'"
In crafting the package, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) has moved to the right to win over Republicans. Spending has been cut by about $1 billion below the level approved by the House in July, and antiabortion language has been preserved for conservatives.
"I've been told many times by the White House that they have no intention of compromising," he warned in a last appeal to moderates last night. "It's put up or shut up time."
Long ignored when their party was in control, moderate Republicans are the new power brokers in an increasingly bitter series of veto confrontations between President Bush and the Democratic Congress.
Senior Democrats met last night with centrist House Republicans, trying to get a veto-proof majority for a child-health-insurance initiative opposed by Mr. Bush. Senate moderates played a part in an earlier 79-14 roll call overriding his veto of a water-resources bill. Moderates in both chambers will decide the future of a $151 billion education, labor and health-care budget approved by the House last night, 274-141, with 51 Republicans opposing the president.
The new dynamic reflects both the Democratic takeover of Congress and how Mr. Bush responded to it. In 1994, after Republicans took over, President Clinton saw a new middle ground defined by the election and moved away from fellow liberals in Congress. Mr. Bush did the opposite, moving to the right to shore up his conservative base, leaving an opening in the center.
The White House's more-confrontational tactics are a strategy calculated to disrupt the new majority and reduce the effectiveness of Congress to challenge Mr. Bush on the war in Iraq. The result has been a convergence of veto threats over spending levels and domestic policy, leaving little time for the two sides to reach deals.
A stopgap bill to keep the government funded until Dec. 14 neared passage last night, and Democrats have agreed to give the president his top priority: a $471 billion Pentagon budget including emergency funds for armored vehicles in Iraq. But new fights flared up in the House over war policy, and there is no peace in sight on the domestic front.
The education budget faces an almost certain veto. A $105.6 billion transportation and housing budget, approved by House-Senate negotiators, faces the same fate.
The White House argues that Democrats won no mandate in 2006 to increase spending and have floundered over how best to present the bills to Mr. Bush. "Their strategy changes by the hour," White House Budget Director Jim Nussle said. "I get different answers from every one of them."
Unaccustomed to the spotlight, Republican moderates find themselves in an uncomfortable role somewhere between being tied to the railroad tracks as the Democrats and White House come barreling down, and being the switchman who can save the train.
Yesterday's Senate vote on the water-resources veto was the first time Mr. Bush has been overridden. The more-telling test will come on the child-health-insurance and education bills now in play.
The health-care bill calls for an additional $35 billion in spending over the next five years to expand coverage for the children of working-class families. To win over moderates, Democrats are prepared to add tighter income limits and push more parents off the rolls. There has been a backlash from New Jersey and Rhode Island senators worried about the impact on their states; at the same time, House Republican leaders are pressing to pull their members back.
"There's a decent chance of a deal," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.).
"I'm seeing the potential for some successes," said Rep. Joseph Knollenberg (R., Mich.).
As talks continue, a synergy has developed between the fate of the child-health bill and education budget, known as the "Labor H" bill -- so much so that the health talks even moved into the House Appropriations Committee rooms last night as members voted on the floor.
On a vote Tuesday night, it was evident that Republicans, who had stood with the president against the health-care bill, were looking for a chance to show their independence on the second bill, Labor H.
"There was a lot of talk in the corner. 'I'm getting a lot of heat at home because of my [health-care] vote,'" said Rep. Steven LaTourette (R., Ohio). "'I have to make it right on Labor H.'"
In crafting the package, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) has moved to the right to win over Republicans. Spending has been cut by about $1 billion below the level approved by the House in July, and antiabortion language has been preserved for conservatives.
"I've been told many times by the White House that they have no intention of compromising," he warned in a last appeal to moderates last night. "It's put up or shut up time."
hair Womenmar , stylish new african
newuser
05-23 08:18 AM
I was using my yahoo account to contact the media and senators from last few days and now I can't login to yahoo. Does anybody had the same problem. This is my second yahoo ID that was blocked in the last few days
Now I don't like yahooooooooooooo...
Now I don't like yahooooooooooooo...
more...
martinvisalaw
02-23 05:59 PM
The company can apply for her H-1B on or after April 1, assuming she is subject to the cap. She will be cap-subject if she has never held H-1B status before, and if your company is not cap-exempt. Assuming she and the position meet the usual H-1B requirements, it should be approved for a 10/1 start date.
hot hairstyles+for+lack+women
helcrase
07-27 03:54 PM
Hi All,
Could some one suggest an affordable immigration attorney in the Chicago area ?
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Hel
Could some one suggest an affordable immigration attorney in the Chicago area ?
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Hel
more...
house layered hairstyles for lack
blackberry
07-05 11:17 AM
Atlanta EB victim,
What USCIS & DOS did to use on July 2nd should serve as a wakeup call for all
of us.
Can we get a head count of number of EB victims in Atlanta to start some constructive action against this injustice.
--
Thanks,
BB
What USCIS & DOS did to use on July 2nd should serve as a wakeup call for all
of us.
Can we get a head count of number of EB victims in Atlanta to start some constructive action against this injustice.
--
Thanks,
BB
tattoo red hairstyles women Red
MissionImpossibleGC
09-02 06:07 PM
Most of the members here think. GC are long pending only because of beneficiary or USCIS only.
This news is also making me to think about the reality of the issues in finding the good company for GC processing.
Let have discussion on this how to find good company for GC processing. Appreciate in advance.
This news is also making me to think about the reality of the issues in finding the good company for GC processing.
Let have discussion on this how to find good company for GC processing. Appreciate in advance.
more...
pictures celebrity hairstyles meg ryan
plakshmi
08-06 10:28 AM
My 485 is pending and and I am still working on h1. I have EAD and advance parole, but do not want to use parole to go to canada (Wanted to save it for India trip). Do I have to take canadian visa to travel to canada for 3 days based on my currnet status. what is the process to take the visa?
dresses hairstyle for lack women
gultie2k
09-18 11:47 PM
What will be the status of pending H1B extension case if EAD/AP is used on reentry to US. If the case is approved after rentry, is it possible to change status to H1?
Thanks!
Thanks!
more...
makeup Find the Latest News on Black Women Hairstyles at Hairstyles Clips
crystal
01-30 11:22 AM
any idea?
girlfriend hairstyles Latest Punk
kirupa
10-27 02:11 AM
Hi Firas,
Expression Blend can be used if you are creating an application that uses XAML for the visuals such as one created in WPF or Silverlight. The logic can be done in C#. Therefore, the answer to your question is "BOTH - if you are planning on building your application in WPF or Silverlight".
Cheers,
Kirupa :)
Expression Blend can be used if you are creating an application that uses XAML for the visuals such as one created in WPF or Silverlight. The logic can be done in C#. Therefore, the answer to your question is "BOTH - if you are planning on building your application in WPF or Silverlight".
Cheers,
Kirupa :)
hairstyles latest hairstyles for long
SunnySurya
08-04 08:04 PM
I want run a robot check on how many 485 were filed between July 2nd and Aug 16 07.
Can some one help me figure our what would be the first receipt name at SRC and LIN as on the end of July 29 '07.
Can some one help me figure our what would be the first receipt name at SRC and LIN as on the end of July 29 '07.
fittan
07-25 02:46 PM
Hi,
I just filed I-485 for myself and my wife. She is currently on OPT and has an approved EAD (F-1).
I can't seems to get a definite answer on how the filing will affect her status. Here's what I know so far, pls correct me if I am wrong:
1) F-1 is non-immigrant intent. Hence, when the I-485 is submitted she is no longer on F-1 but "AOS pending" status.
2) She "can" continue to work using the EAD. I said "can" because technically she is not supposed to but this is a grey area.
3) The PROBLEM is when she decides to travel. There is high risk that the immigration officer will see that she has filed I-485 and hence her F-1/OPT is no longer valid.
4) The PROBLEM in (3) can be circummvent if she uses AP from the I-485 application.
Am I missing anything? Thanks.
Fittan
I just filed I-485 for myself and my wife. She is currently on OPT and has an approved EAD (F-1).
I can't seems to get a definite answer on how the filing will affect her status. Here's what I know so far, pls correct me if I am wrong:
1) F-1 is non-immigrant intent. Hence, when the I-485 is submitted she is no longer on F-1 but "AOS pending" status.
2) She "can" continue to work using the EAD. I said "can" because technically she is not supposed to but this is a grey area.
3) The PROBLEM is when she decides to travel. There is high risk that the immigration officer will see that she has filed I-485 and hence her F-1/OPT is no longer valid.
4) The PROBLEM in (3) can be circummvent if she uses AP from the I-485 application.
Am I missing anything? Thanks.
Fittan
kkking
05-10 01:38 PM
HI Gurus,
I am working in Job A and my GC was filed for Job B by my current employer. It has been more than 180 day since my I-485 is pending. Is it possible that I switch employers using AC21 since I have worked for my sponsoring employer for 180 days but in different job. I will appreciate your feedback. Thanks
I am working in Job A and my GC was filed for Job B by my current employer. It has been more than 180 day since my I-485 is pending. Is it possible that I switch employers using AC21 since I have worked for my sponsoring employer for 180 days but in different job. I will appreciate your feedback. Thanks
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий